Replies to cabal, page 7
-
@cabal You're oppressing my rights, TRIGGERED.
-
@cabal You.
-
@cabal Cable reads my fanfictions, of course.
-
@cabal heh. I wondered whether you deleted some of your activity maybe but don't know why you would.
-
@cabal Indeed. Welcome to my daily life! xD
-
@cabal rock on 90's! Hi there Cabal
-
@cabal at least got a couch there?
-
@cabal Mock indignation at a fanfiction shipping Trixie with Blueblood.
-
@cabal, isn't it just? Mewtwo's looking a bit worse for wear though.
-
@cabal fatallity!
-
@cabal I hate my ISP XD
-
@cabal I didn't know your worked for an ISP! Sorry about that. :P
-
@cabal Well, hope you've been occupying your time with cool things!
-
@cabal It's been so long!! *faints*
-
@cabal Hey man!
-
@cabal what's cute?
-
@cabal I wonder... are you on, even now?
Wednesday, 26-Dec-12 08:36:07 UTC from web -
@cabal So, I guess there's no way we can make you believe that we're a fine little community who never fights for no reason and is always respectful to each other?
-
@cabal Nice to see you passing by here again. Merry Christmas!
-
@cabal Shh, great Cabal, they musn't know!
-
@cabal I'm afraid I don't know you enough to love you.
-
@cabal READY YET?
-
@cabal Twitch Glomps!
-
@cabal ARE. YOU. READY. MISTER. CABLE.
-
@cabal CABLE, ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE THAT?
-
@cabal Once I get my license, I will try. All the ones i've applied for so far have fallen out.
-
@cabal Huh. That'd be... pretty much the same time I started following it. Maybe after, if anything (started following in '06, and given we're about a year apart, that'd mean you were either 16 or 17 then, slap-bang in the middle of that time period). Now I'm just confused.
-
@cabal Huh. I've been following the project on and off for quite a while now, and I don't recall the dependencies ever not being catalogued in full, but depending on how old you are (I won't ask if you don't want to say~) that probably doesn't date back as far as you're talking about. That... euch, that would've been unpleasant, but fortunately it certainly isn't a problem with current (B)LfS revisions. :)