Conversation
Notices
-
Oooh I need a 4k TV to see this video in all of it's glory. I wasn't aware Youtube could do that yet.
Wednesday, 19-Mar-14 16:55:43 UTC from web-
@xeleanorxrigbyx 4K honestly seems pointless to me. Anything above 1024x768 is enough for the eye
-
@nerthos I'm sure that's what they said in 1995 too.
-
@xeleanorxrigbyx And it holds true unless you're using a 40" monitor
-
@nerthos As an avid fan of 2160x3840 I say eat a butt
-
@nerthos I have a PC hooked up to a 51" TV as a second monitor, does that count?
-
@thatonestocking Do you use your monitor sideways or something you butt monkey?
-
@xeleanorxrigbyx Yeah, it does
-
@nerthos That's how you're supposed to use widescreen monitors you mongoloid.
-
@thatonestocking That makes literally 0 sense you milksop.
-
@nerthos 3d 4k
-
@meloetta 3d is dumb
-
@nerthos that's why we in the ghetto watch in small resolution cause we can't afford it
-
@thatonestocking 2160x3840 would look like this http://rainbowdash.net/attachment/724567
-
@meloetta The fake 3D we have today is a waste of money and brain effort. 3D won't be neither cool nor useful until agumented reality.
-
@nerthos Yeah, our TV has 3D. It's garbage.
-
@xeleanorxrigbyx My cousin described 3D movies as "watching them through the bottom of a glass of water"
-
@nerthos Some of them are fun to see in Imax. But at home? Nah. I bought my boyfriend the newest Spiderman in 3D and that murdock was unwatchable.
-
@xeleanorxrigbyx That pretty much sums it up. For it to be somewhat decent you need equipment worth hundreds of thousands.
-
@nerthos I do have to give the TV some props though: Uncharted 3 actually looked pretty nice in 3D.
-
@nerthos Maybe he plays a lot of Shmups?
-
@ceruleanspark Sounds legit
-
