Conversation

Notices

  1. RD69 RD69

    im bored... QUICK EVERYONE REPLY TO THIS WITH THE STRANGEST AND OR MOST RANDOM THING YOU CAN POSSIBLY THINK OF!!!

    Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:38:47 UTC from web
    1. Rarity Rarity

      @rd69 *holds up spork*

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:39:00 UTC from web
      1. RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space) RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space)

        @rarity https://derpiboo.ru/289759

        Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:43:44 UTC from web
    2. Narwhal Narwhal

      @rd69 Quantum physics

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:39:55 UTC from web
    3. RD69 RD69

      i think Rarity is winning

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:41:27 UTC from web
    4. Narwhal Narwhal

      @e That's pretty much as close as you're gonna get to "true" randomness

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:41:34 UTC from web
      1. RD69 RD69

        @northernnarwhal i think you might be right... UNLESS YOU WATCH THIS!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DRXudT1bos

        Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:43:45 UTC from web
        1. Narwhal Narwhal

          @rd69 I think I'm still right :o

          Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:45:48 UTC from web
        2. MetalTao MetalTao

          @rd69 First of. Does Random even exist?

          Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:46:28 UTC from web
          1. MetalTao MetalTao

            @metaltao * ,

            Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:46:33 UTC from web
          2. RD69 RD69

            @metaltao the answer to that is Pinkie Pie

            Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:47:34 UTC from web
            1. MetalTao MetalTao

              @rd69 SHe is predictable, she does something that will break the norm on a regular basis.\

              Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:48:17 UTC from web
    5. MetalTao MetalTao

      @rd69 Broccoli

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:42:53 UTC from web
    6. Narwhal Narwhal

      @e Well the reasoning behind it is that you can only know the properties of something with wave particle duality after you observe it, rather than before (like Schrodinger's Cat)

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:44:38 UTC from web
    7. Narwhal Narwhal

      @e Not that alone but it's one of the major points

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:46:31 UTC from web
    8. Narwhal Narwhal

      @e Well if it makes you feel better it's not technically proven random since we don't know everything about quantum physics, but it's considered the closest we can get to "true" randomness.

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:49:10 UTC from web
    9. Narwhal Narwhal

      @e I wouldn't consider myself deterministic, but I don't like misusing the term random so I consider myself "impulsive".

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:53:14 UTC from web
    10. Narwhal Narwhal

      @e As in I act on whatever comes to my mind immediately, and I generally go with my gut.

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:54:35 UTC from web
      1. MetalTao MetalTao

        @northernnarwhal That would be akin to impulsive. Would you sya you think before you act?

        Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:55:07 UTC from web
        1. Narwhal Narwhal

          @metaltao Usually no

          Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:56:19 UTC from web
          1. MetalTao MetalTao

            @northernnarwhal Ahhh, So, would you say you sometimes act impulseive but the majority, you act within your reasons?

            Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:56:57 UTC from web
            1. Narwhal Narwhal

              @metaltao No I'm usually pretty impulsive, but that's not to say I don't use reason as well. Just that it's usually my immediate reason.

              Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:58:17 UTC from web
        2. RD69 RD69

          @metaltao i do 99% of the time! maybe thats why i get hurt so much...

          Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:57:55 UTC from web
    11. MetalTao MetalTao

      @e Just define it or use it please? This will be cool to learn? DON'T TEASE ME!

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:55:59 UTC from web
      1. loveydoe loveydoe

        @metaltao 'Deterministic' means that the rules and initial state of the universe determine exactly what happens during its run through. If one were to start the universe over again, it would run exactly the same way, in a deterministic universe.

        Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:59:31 UTC from bti
        1. MetalTao MetalTao

          @loveydoe That is slightly terrifying... But I can deal with that, But isn't Quantum Mysticism the opposite of that?

          Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 06:00:22 UTC from web
    12. Narwhal Narwhal

      @e Yes, that everything is the caused by a natural law.

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:56:13 UTC from web
    13. Narwhal Narwhal

      @e Basically I don't think as much about things when I do them

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:57:29 UTC from web
    14. MetalTao MetalTao

      @e OOO what about Quantum Mysticism?

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:59:21 UTC from web
      1. Narwhal Narwhal

        @metaltao Not at all like it. That's pseudoscience.

        Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 06:01:08 UTC from web
        1. MetalTao MetalTao

          @northernnarwhal Oh... kiwi...

          Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 06:01:30 UTC from web
        2. MetalTao MetalTao

          @northernnarwhal *thinks back* DAMN! I MISSED THAT!;pSD

          Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 06:01:45 UTC from web
        3. MetalTao MetalTao

          @northernnarwhal Sorry about thta'.

          Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 06:02:03 UTC from web
          1. Narwhal Narwhal

            @metaltao It's fine, it's a simple mistake.

            Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 06:02:31 UTC from web
    15. MetalTao MetalTao

      @e Or am I jumping the gun?

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 05:59:36 UTC from web
    16. Narwhal Narwhal

      @e I'm definitely closer to being for determinism than against it

      Tuesday, 29-Jul-14 06:00:09 UTC from web