Conversation
Notices
-
I'm marking not safe for children content with #nsfw and use the rot13 feature on it. Is that allowed? Is there a propper way to do it, like a #nsfc tag?
Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:29:59 UTC from web-
@kamikaze That's fine. Better than average, even.
-
@kamikaze the NSFW tag is pretty much the catch-all "you wouldn't want your little sister seeing this" marker. So it's perfectly ok.
-
@kamikaze Goddamit I've done that on occasion, Rot13'd it AND put a NSFW tag on it, and just because it was something that I dunno... had bare human boobs on the other end, it wasnt allowed, there needs to do this on a chalkboard, Doc Brown back to the future style to define these bloody rules
-
@purplephish20 Well /that's/ still against the rules. A casual mention of it isn't, but barechested ladies are against the rules. Think of something like The Simpsons; if they wouldn't get away with it there, you can't get away with it here.
-
@purplephish20 That falls into the "Don't link pornographic material directly" rule.
-
@redenchilada they got away with barts bare knob in the movie
-
@purplephish20 For real? People have /entirely seriously/ gone to prison for that exact highly specific thing.
-
@redenchilada Do you think rule lawyering should be considered harassment?
-
@ceruleanspark Errr... yeah, look it up. When I saw it the cinema erupted in stupid laughter.... why the hell did I go and see that terrible movie
-
@purplephish20 http://jonathanturley.org/2010/01/27/doh-man-arrested-for-possession-of-pornographic-images-of-marge-simpson/
-
@colfax If they're sincerely mistaken, no. If they're badgering us just to argue a rule, yes.
-
@ceruleanspark Seen that, Lol'd
-
@redenchilada @ceruleanspark Thanks. BTW, I like how my question exploded into this huge thing.
-
@redenchilada I was under the impression that it was only for links to external content.
-
@toksyuryel It's been used primarily for that, but if people wish to use it for other things such as what kamikaze is saying, I don't wanna discourage that.
-
