Replies to eaglehooves, page 28

  1. @eaglehooves too much work for too little reward. I'm probably the only one who likes using his smart phone as not much more than a phone.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 22:01:43 UTC from web in context
  2. @eaglehooves More or more.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 21:04:17 UTC from web in context
  3. @eaglehooves I'm just generally saying it's overrun by little kids with no sense of privacy or respect.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 19:58:56 UTC from web in context
  4. @eaglehooves What doesn't he have a problem with?

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 19:58:31 UTC from web in context
  5. @eaglehooves Sweetie Belle is both robot and dictionary.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 19:14:57 UTC from web in context
  6. @eaglehooves Even more incoherent.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 19:13:17 UTC from web in context
  7. @eaglehooves Spot-on.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 19:10:06 UTC from web in context
  8. @eaglehooves Yes, it does burn, it burns the flame of great design and carries it all the way to your computer!

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 19:06:42 UTC from web in context
  9. @eaglehooves not if you cheat, and piggy back on an already good filtering program...

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 19:03:08 UTC from web in context
  10. @eaglehooves My mistakes. I did not go back and check.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 19:01:26 UTC from web in context
  11. @eaglehooves also make it a smart filter, it gets stricter on known abusers

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 19:01:08 UTC from web in context
  12. @eaglehooves just have it default to blocking the word if it can't detect context

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 18:59:55 UTC from web in context
  13. @eaglehooves Actually contest detection wouldn't be that bad... look for commonly used pronouns, and adjectives, and whatnot like "being A ****" it is used as a noun, so it can look for words that come with it like "A"

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 18:56:57 UTC from web in context
  14. @eaglehooves Thanks for the input!

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 17:26:35 UTC from web in context
  15. @eaglehooves Apple. It just crashed and corrupted the files it was interacting with.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 04:56:38 UTC from web in context
  16. @eaglehooves Best idea.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 04:48:36 UTC from web in context
  17. @eaglehooves So you're saying that studying carpentry and upholstery might be a better approach?

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 04:46:09 UTC from web in context
  18. @eaglehooves ... You can have some of mine...

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 04:39:47 UTC from web in context
  19. @eaglehooves No, dude, you're supposed to open a text document and post whatever you end up typing while cleaning your keyboard somewhere. Possibly on tumblr.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 04:35:24 UTC from web in context
  20. @eaglehooves Cause I can :) and I wanna see RDN on 95...

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 03:06:34 UTC from web in context
  21. @eaglehooves NO

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 03:06:32 UTC from web in context
  22. @eaglehooves @techdisk @anarchycarcino It actually kind of searches google... if you can actually hit search.

    Sunday, 30-Sep-12 00:36:07 UTC from web in context
  23. @eaglehooves Yeah. Hence why I was joking about past midnight/lights off being an ideal situation - it's the angels episode. :P (And since last week had them in the "next time" trailer, I can finally say that without people complaining that it's a semi-spoiler.)

    Saturday, 29-Sep-12 23:56:36 UTC from web in context
  24. @eaglehooves 10 years is pretty long. Firefox, as "Phoenix", first appeared in September 2002.

    Saturday, 29-Sep-12 04:14:59 UTC from web in context
  25. @eaglehooves Yeah, I've got one and I'm broke now too. Probably because I bought a new LED HDTV. ._.

    Saturday, 29-Sep-12 03:39:56 UTC from web in context
  26. @eaglehooves Me too but both without anything added.

    Saturday, 29-Sep-12 02:02:08 UTC from web in context
  27. @gladosenchilada @eaglehooves Shh I just woke up. xD

    Saturday, 29-Sep-12 01:40:34 UTC from web in context
  28. @eaglehooves ...Wow, Wikipedia doesn't even list it.

    Saturday, 29-Sep-12 01:39:53 UTC from web in context
  29. @eaglehooves Oh, if I talk about the "greater Austin area" instead it's 11,085 km².

    Saturday, 29-Sep-12 01:30:13 UTC from web in context
  30. @eaglehooves http://www.mspaintadventures.com/?s=6&p=002581

    Saturday, 29-Sep-12 00:34:56 UTC from web in context