Replies to adiwan, page 2

  1. @adiwan It'd be nice to see America dip its toes into the modern industrialized world

    about 4 months ago from web in context
  2. @adiwan Protect? I wonder how many Murikkkans are planning to be the raiders!

    about 4 months ago from web in context
  3. @adiwan A lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous.

    about 4 months ago from web in context
  4. @adiwan "You liked a Japanese thing? Our algorithms can't handle variety!!"

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  5. @adiwan I wonder how the Sanic movie is doing?

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  6. @adiwan That's a downer, I'm about that reliable public infrastructure yo

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  7. @adiwan Holy crap dude that is savage

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  8. @adiwan So anyway, today is a very blustery day, might as well be Windsday... XD fml

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  9. @adiwan Oh, yeah, the tv show. It is a bit loose in the overarching story department. The movies are more solid in that regard, but the events in them are somewhat ignored for the show.

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  10. @adiwan The movies or the show?

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  11. @adiwan CIA, Girl Scouts division.

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  12. @adiwan I think they usually just camp in front of the pot dispensaries

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  13. @adiwan Not that anyone outside of conspiracy talk radio has been able to discover

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  14. @adiwan Mostly the seasonal novelty and the fact of supporting the Scouts. They're all fine and good, but like Matt said, they're not exactly *exclusive* in any real way.

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  15. @adiwan I can vouch for the last bit, a perfect example is the marvel cape movies. They look just fine on tv or a cinema screen, but look at scenes in >1080 60fps on a high DPI cellphone screen and the actors look awkward, movement looks cartoony and poorly acted, you can notice the weird physics from cable pulls and all that.

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  16. @adiwan I'm not sure I'm ready for it to be over

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  17. @adiwan Somehow, the hi-tech option is less civilized...

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  18. @adiwan The high frame rate video debate is scheduled to be the next big generational tech gap, according to one headline I skimmed once online. "Gemini Man" will remain dumb, regardless.

    about 5 months ago from web in context
  19. @adiwan Throw a chopped potato and some prawns in with the rice, it's the only Iron Chef recipe I've been able to pick up from the show.

    about 6 months ago from web in context
  20. @adiwan buy a pressure cooker and you can cook rice and more in minutes.

    about 6 months ago from web in context
  21. @adiwan Not headless! Paint a Nerf ball and glue some felt ears on it.

    about 6 months ago from web in context
  22. @adiwan C# is honestly the best Java-like ever and this is one example why.

    about 6 months ago from web in context
  23. @adiwan Directly modifying the properties of an object?! No thank you! Use getters and setters. butt.enable();

    about 6 months ago from web in context
  24. @adiwan @scribus Y’all ever been woken up by an air raid siren

    about 6 months ago from web in context
  25. @adiwan Neat! I always preferred custom settings, myself. Keeps the players from reading ahead, lol.

    about 6 months ago from web in context
  26. @adiwan Oooh, has Spelljammer had a 5E update!?

    about 6 months ago from web in context
  27. @adiwan Right on, hope it all goes well.

    about 6 months ago from web in context
  28. @adiwan Dang, dude... Sometimes, I roll behind the screen so that I can claim a nasty 20 was only an 18 or so.

    about 6 months ago from web in context
  29. @adiwan 2080 TI ?

    about 7 months ago from web in context
  30. @adiwan That is how I used to play Anno 1404 multiplayer, Untill I realised that due to Ubisoft's shoddy coding it would just grab the first network-interface ( of type X, where X is either wired or wireless ) to try to connect to other players.

    Which is a HUGE problem if you have, for instance, VirtualBox installed since it creates a virtual adapter.

    about 7 months ago from web in context