Conversation
Notices
-
Alright, you've woken me up on the first day of my christmas holidays. Always a good way to ensure I'm receptive to your viewpoint. That aside, I'm going to put this bluntly, because, hey, this time, I didn't actually start it: @yodelerty Yes, I get it. You think @rarity should be banned. Guess what? That ship sailed. He wasn't, because I saw in him the capacity to change and improve his behaviour. I'm not going to go back in time and retroactively ban him for a situation that, as far as all relevant participants are concerned, has been resolved. Your extremely transparent attempts at provoking him and others into opening it back up to get him banned are well known to the staff, and simply by that virtue, automatically doomed to fail. Yes, even when you go on skype and tell @foxgopher to come to the timeline to start stuff on your behalf. It's not that subtle, really.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:55:50 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark I didn't even say anything to him. Why am I the bad guy suddenly
-
@foxgopher You literally only come here to "Defend" @yodelerty when he starts crap. Also, I've been here for like an hour. You've been trying to provoke @rarity pretty much the entire time you've been here. People have actually noticed, so you've already failed in your objective here.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:00:03 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark I'm not trying to provoke anyone. I'm also here other times, usually when you aren't. I didn't do a thing to rarity until he said something rude to me about my own post. So Idk what objective you think I have, but there isn't one.
-
-
-
@ceruleanspark What? I never got Alex to get on here. The other stuff is pretty much true but I don't get my friends to fight my battles.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:59:06 UTC from web-
@yodelerty Of course, that's why he /only/ turns up when the drama involves both you and @rarity, and why he defaults to your side. Clearly just a coincidence. Even if it IS just a coincidence, you've done such a thorough job of annihilating your own credibility that nobody is going to believe that anyway.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:03:13 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark Dude, he showed up here and then started talking to me. If he wants to take my side, that's his choice. I actually told him I deserved everything that was coming to me. He disagreed. That's what happened. Don't try to pretend you know what you're talking about.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:07:30 UTC from web-
@yodelerty GO TO BED DANE
-
@foxgopher But this Binding of Isaac run
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:09:22 UTC from web
-
-
@yodelerty I don't actually care why your self-esteem-team is here or the particular chronology of events that lead to them arriving, I've just run completely out of patience with you and your crap. I've tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, and extend to you the same oh-so-controversial courtesy I gave @rarity, (the same one you're so violently opposed to), but where he made a sincere effort to reach out to me and demonstrate he wanted to make a change, you've made a sincere effort to antagonise both me and and my staff. So I will reiterate: what you want is not going to happen, however much you choose to throw your toys around and try and disrupt the timeline. Get over it. No matter how much you complain to @widget that I'm "Destroying the site" on SBN (Still a public site guys, you're not hidden when you post there), I'm not going anywhere
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:17:11 UTC from web -
@yodelerty But hey, let's walkthrough it anyway: You don't want to leave because you like some of the people here/don't want to be alone, but you want /me/ the person responsible for the entire settings existence to leave. What do you think is going to happen? That the site is just going to keep existing with nobody to run it? Leaving and removing the site from existence achieve the exact same end goal here.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:19:16 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark I'm well aware that you leaving is going to leave the site with no one to run it. I guess I just hoped someone who could actually run the site with a good level of professionalism would be available. But I guess since widget's gone there's no one to fit that role. Whatever. Continue with whatever you think you
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:27:23 UTC from web-
@yodelerty 're doing.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:27:30 UTC from web -
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:33:49 UTC from web
-
@yodelerty A professional would have just taken you out at the start, but I decided you and anyone else who chooses to is entitled to have their own opinion of me, however negative it may be. 'ol GreyScale thinks I'm a cherries, and Cabals opinion of me couldn't be lower without the aid of professional grade mining equipment, and they're entitled to think that. However, they both have the basic common decency to iterate it once or twice, then stop. You, however, just keep needling and needling until stuff like this happens. No doubt within hours you'll be smugly asserting that I'm clearly unsuitable for leadership because my patience wasn't infinite. Nobody, not even @widget, who was practically a saint when it came to this specific sort of thing, would put up with this indefinitely.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:46:28 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
@ceruleanspark Considering the sheer amount of episodes of Dane-related minor drama that go on here, the idea that Foxgopher just happened to log in in the middle of it by coincidence is credible. Even more so taking into account he was happy enough to derail from the topic if prompted and engage in regular conversation, something that tends not to happen when someone logs just to fight.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:14:43 UTC from web-
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:17:12 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
@dewnor Guess what? It's his site. The site has been arguing for however long. He can do whatever the /cherries/ he wants, he owns it.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:06:42 UTC from web -
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:09:49 UTC from web
-
@dewnor Considering that you're the picture definition of instigating crap, I really don't want to hear anything from you. This is my third warning and you're being muted for 24 hours starting now.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:11:34 UTC from web -
@snowcone meh.. Cabal didn't like a lot of users. I think I might have been once of them at least sometimes.
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:50:56 UTC from web-
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:51:24 UTC from web
-
-
Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:54:38 UTC from web
-
