Conversation
Notices
-
welcome to furry dick convention
Tuesday, 05-Apr-16 19:53:36 UTC from web-
-
@firestormdangerdash Spoilers: Bronies are furries
Tuesday, 05-Apr-16 20:27:49 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark techinicly they are not anthromorphic.
-
@firestormdangerdash Technically they are, in that they express humanlike characteristics.
Tuesday, 05-Apr-16 20:33:45 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark True. But in the classic sense of the accepted definition is being in the shape of a human. I man if you wanted to overly define everything to a T, the world would have a bad time.
-
@firestormdangerdash I think Cerulean's actually the one using the traditional definition of the word here, you're the one making exceptions and utilizing connotations.
-
@narwhal @scribus I never would of guessed anything ever made in the entierty that is the human race that had a slightly above normal intelligance in a none human ment you must be unconditionaly a furry.
Even furries are not that broad with the term. Any and all use it is "normally" used on the internet is upright animals. Only exceptions is if it was made to be part of the furry fandom. Even then you cant say "you like Robin Hood with the fox, you're a furry!". It could be a prelude to them wanting to see more anthro type animals. Thus becoming a furry, sure. Jeez this is as bad as the time I talked with a nsfw artist that insisted she didnt due nsfw art since she did it for commission not free time. http://rainbowdash.net/attachment/836888
-
@narwhal sorry, misread your context. Yes he was right in definition, just was in a rebutal that meeting that definition doesn't hit furry fandom statues in most fantasy characters.
-
-
@firestormdangerdash I tend to fall into the "letting literally any word mean literally whatever you want is literally the worst way to language" camp, myself.
-
-
-
-
-
@firestormdangerdash Me as a dad
Tuesday, 05-Apr-16 21:34:07 UTC from web
-
-
