Replies to foxgopher, page 68

  1. *coughs*

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 23:45:15 UTC from web in context
  2. @foxgopher Maybe even three quiet.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 23:44:31 UTC from web in context
  3. @foxgopher that is quite true plus they might have had suffered a little fallout due to being so close to china or, at that time, might have had an american military hub for the pacific.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:09:24 UTC from web in context
  4. @foxgopher But this Binding of Isaac run

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:09:22 UTC from web in context
  5. @foxgopher Oh, no? How so? #

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:08:51 UTC from web in context
  6. @foxgopher You literally only come here to "Defend" @yodelerty when he starts crap. Also, I've been here for like an hour. You've been trying to provoke @rarity pretty much the entire time you've been here. People have actually noticed, so you've already failed in your objective here.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 07:00:03 UTC from web in context
  7. Alright, you've woken me up on the first day of my christmas holidays. Always a good way to ensure I'm receptive to your viewpoint. That aside, I'm going to put this bluntly, because, hey, this time, I didn't actually start it: @yodelerty Yes, I get it. You think @rarity should be banned. Guess what? That ship sailed. He wasn't, because I saw in him the capacity to change and improve his behaviour. I'm not going to go back in time and retroactively ban him for a situation that, as far as all relevant participants are concerned, has been resolved. Your extremely transparent attempts at provoking him and others into opening it back up to get him banned are well known to the staff, and simply by that virtue, automatically doomed to fail. Yes, even when you go on skype and tell @foxgopher to come to the timeline to start stuff on your behalf. It's not that subtle, really.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:55:50 UTC from web in context
  8. @foxgopher You probably have other stuff to do.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:54:03 UTC from web in context
  9. @foxgopher You don't fall behind yourself. It's nice to talk to someone who takes the time to sit down and think rationally.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:49:31 UTC from web in context
  10. @foxgopher TL;DR: The /entire/ userbase needs to chill out.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:49:17 UTC from web in context
  11. @foxgopher All I did was say that people are only mean to Dane because he's mean to them. Several other people said the same thing. So why single out me?

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:48:54 UTC from web in context
  12. @foxgopher You just said that mods provoke it. I'm pretty sure that's blaming.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:46:59 UTC from web in context
  13. @foxgopher The blame lies on modern society's distinct lack of consequences. In the last few decades people have been allowed to do pretty much anything, hence why most now reach adulthood without having transitioned from kids to men.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:46:59 UTC from web in context
  14. @foxgopher Then the obvious answer is you're looking for reasons to be mad at me, same as Dane.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:46:22 UTC from web in context
  15. @foxgopher Yes, because it's totally the staff's fault.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:44:17 UTC from web in context
  16. @foxgopher I love you too. *goes away to write*

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:43:52 UTC from web in context
  17. @foxgopher you're only around when drama goes on. If you were a regular user of this site you would see that that is simply not the case. And anyways, I'm trying to work on my anger issues.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:43:45 UTC from web in context
  18. @foxgopher It gets out of hand because few know how to be chill, mods or otherwise.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:43:17 UTC from web in context
  19. @foxgopher pride preceedeth the fall

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:41:53 UTC from web in context
  20. @foxgopher I've touched you before so I don't need to do it again

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:41:25 UTC from web in context
  21. @foxgopher that's not being untouchable. work on your definitions

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:40:13 UTC from web in context
  22. @foxgopher Oh, yeah, being untouchable is pretty nice. Then again, all who are withing that group know how to behave.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:38:50 UTC from web in context
  23. @foxgopher No one here is untouchable.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:38:16 UTC from web in context
  24. @foxgopher I'm a relic of another era, with tighter rules. I'd break the site in pieces right now.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:34:11 UTC from web in context
  25. @foxgopher I know.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:30:29 UTC from web in context
  26. @foxgopher I assumed you were making a snide remark. My apologies.

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:26:21 UTC from web in context
  27. @foxgopher I'll be one!

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:25:36 UTC from web in context
  28. @foxgopher The image is RDN

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:25:30 UTC from web in context
  29. @foxgopher http://ur1.ca/g7cuf

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:23:24 UTC from web in context
  30. @foxgopher i'll cut ya

    Monday, 16-Dec-13 06:20:46 UTC from web in context