Notices by Crusader 8 (princelypublictimeline), page 4

Crusader 8 MetalTao

@metaltao youre making the robin hood argument that its ok to steal from certain people and not from others, not based on any real ethics but rather just on their income. Arguably immoral to believe this.

Crusader 8 caret7

@caret7 then there ya go

Crusader 8 caret7

@caret7 and if buy something you can use what you purchase as long as you obey the law and agree to any terms and conditions set by the seller.

Crusader 8 caret7

@caret7 there's also property that's either physical or intellectual. There's a lot of law that protects people's property so that they can safely use it for whatever purpose

Crusader 8 caret7

@caret7 law. We already have laws. Theyre a thing. If you file for a copyright or patent, thats what determines it. The owner can choose to share or sell his property whether it be physical or otherwise. Someone acquiring said stuff without owner's permiwsionxis therefore breaking law.

Crusader 8 caret7

@caret7 yes. The alternative would be people agreeing that theft is a moral action, aka I dont wanna hear any whining when people legally empty a thief's house of all his/her property. Lets take it a step back further: can you logically support theft as a moral action?

Crusader 8 caret7

@caret7 because it's notabout whether the owner lost it, it's about whether someone who isnt supposed to have it illegally acquires it. There could be infinite apples but if theyre not for you but you take one then it's theft. Theft theft theft theft

Crusader 8 Gherkin ☑️

@thelastgherkin whaaaaa?

Crusader 8 Thunder

@thundertheyellowchangeling welcome to rdn, where I'm the only equestria girls fan.

Crusader 8 Matt

@zeldatra how does appreciation of the character indicate sexual orie tation

Crusader 8

@nut ok :D

Crusader 8 Narwhal

@northernnarwhal okaay

Crusader 8

@nut aaaah take medicine! Or suck on ice cubes.

Crusader 8 Cerulean Spark

@cinnamonswirl but we're not sure that's a pattern due to them/their world, or just air-tight writing. Remember in shows/movies/comics that dreams are never meaningless and writers who use dreams always justify them in the narrative. Since we dont have enogh info to distinguish which of these is true, we need to start re-examining the validity of either the premise or claim

Crusader 8 Narwhal

@northernnarwhal go to bread lol

Crusader 8 Narwhal

@northernnarwhal @nut ive been up since 3pm yesterday, im at work from 9pm till 7am, then off to my other job 9am to 1-2pm. But the work isnt hard so its not as bad as it sounds

Crusader 8 Cerulean Spark

@cinnamonswirl im not being aggressive or condescending. Im just confused on why we were exploring the consequences of a faulty premise

Crusader 8 Cerulean Spark

@cinnamonswirl funny you show him, i just had kfc the other day

Crusader 8 Cerulean Spark

@cinnamonswirl subconscience=/= dreams. Also, modern psychology debates the old idea of subconscience as a misnomer based on improperly applying spacial logic to something that does not behave in a spacial manner (aka what we believe to be the subconscience may not be that at all)

Crusader 8 Cerulean Spark

@cinnamonswirl the bottom line is, we still know squat about dreams and applying a shaky understanding of that to a children's cartoon isn't going to work

Crusader 8 Cerulean Spark

@cinnamonswirl ok so what determines it? If i need to be X passionate enough about doing it, then id be having naughty dreams all the time. If it's determined by personal importance or survival/success/urgency, then the driving to work example would still stand