Replies to zennx

  1. @zennx Due to me never seeing "Teen Titans", I actually thought the first episode of "Teen Titans Go!" rather funny.

    But, ehmm. I get the jest. PPG's twerking... Childhood-cyanide™

    about 3 hours ago from web in context
  2. @zennx He's... Uh? Why does it matter?

    about 4 hours ago from web in context
  3. @zennx That's racist

    about 4 hours ago from web in context
  4. @zennx No he's black.

    about 4 hours ago from web in context
  5. @nerthos @tiffany @zennx 3 replies in less than a minute, wow. I'll adjust my expectations to "Lunatics Unleashed" levels then. Also, what are 'toyetic' reasons ?

    about 4 hours ago from web in context
  6. @zennx it's illegal to send death threats to anybody

    about 4 hours ago from web in context
  7. @zennx And then some wonder why people support Trump.

    about 4 hours ago from web in context
  8. @mrmattimation @zennx Thank you

    about a day ago from web in context
  9. @zennx Well, that Patreon thingie is actually icing on the cake. ( I touched it when I said "unique position", although I just realized that Thunderf00t also has Patreon in a simmilar if not same manner, and then there are others ). But yes, you are right... Well he has something to lose, and that is being booted off of YouTube completely because of his shenanigans. But do you honestly think YouTube ( as a company who'se primary motivation seems money ) is to start setting fire to Jim's proverbial ship with the possibility of the whole harbour catching fire ? ... Yeah... I love to see this play out

    about a day ago from web in context
  10. @zennx Clearly, you have no clue how the "system" works. If you make a claim on me I can immediately dispute it and until that issue gets settled, all of the money earned by the video in that time period would be placed in a holding account, and once YouTube determines who the money rightfully belongs to (me) I will get the money that was earned in the time it takes the claim to be dismissed.

    about a day ago from web in context
  11. @mrmattimation @zennx And in that last 'rant' I saw absolutely nothing that is not ( together with that last thing I said ) proving to either be great for "fair use" or terribly bad for either Jim or Youtube.

    about a day ago from web in context
  12. @zennx So, rather than just, say, NOT use copy-written content in your own videos, therefore allowing you to legally monetize your own videos (I cannot stress enough that if you're using other people's ideas, music, video, etc. you are not legally in the position to complain if they take your revenue) like a reasonable person would do, you would rather INCREASE the amount of content that is not yours, creating a high risk for an eventual takedown (I also cannot stress that fact enough), simply so that the publishers or copyright holders of the works which you are using illegally don't make money off of the video which you are not legally allowed to make money off of?

    about a day ago from web in context
  13. @mrmattimation @zennx *wressles with uncooperative RDN for a while*. I'm sorry but I just HAVE to react to this. Pretty sure Matt does not realize just who "Jim cherrying Sterling" is, what he is doing, and how he has at least one "YouTube insured & protected" video. In case you do not realize what this means, Jim is in an unique position. In the best case this means that YouTube has to shill out money to protect Jim and his channel ( by mobilizing whatever counter-force is required, like, you know, lawyers ). And it might even end up in Konami and Nintendo going at eachothers throat in the ensuring crossfire. And in the worst case scenario ( for jim ) then we see him go down with the ship ( all except for 1 protected video ).

    I do not think Jim is that stupid, so he probably knows his stuff, and if not ? Well lets just say I always enjoyed a good ship-burning.

    Regardless, if big Fluffle Puff goes down ( looks like it ) big changes are ensured to follow.

    about a day ago from web in context
  14. @zennx I only thank Loki the trickster God ( Yes I brought the Trickster-DLC )

    about a day ago from web in context
  15. @zennx Please do not explain terms to me. I have to manage this Fluffle Puff regularly, I know what each one is. If you have twenty copyright claims from twenty different copyright holders, one of those claims is going to result in a takedown sooner or later..

    about a day ago from web in context
  16. @zennx That's, um...

    If you go out and blatantly infringe someone else's copyright, they have every right to make a claim on you. That's on you. Not them. Infringing MULTIPLE companies' copyrights isn't going to somehow make you the good guy in that scenario, it just gives you that many more chances to get your video taken down by a lawyer representing one of the companies.

    about a day ago from web in context
  17. @zennx why would every one be a bard?

    about 2 days ago from web in context
  18. @zennx although, truth be told they have catchy songs

    about 2 days ago from web in context
  19. @zennx i got it today, played the first stage with Lilac

    about 2 days ago from web in context
  20. @zennx But do they realize that everything in congress is stretched out to the point where it moves so slowly that scientists are not able to explain it ? I mean, could you put an FPS counter on that ?

    about 2 days ago from web in context
  21. @zennx http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/shvrs.gif

    about 2 days ago from web in context
  22. @zennx [Jerry Seinfeld mode engaged] And you know why they would make bad (vice) presidents ? Ever had to make a really hard decision ? It's a really warm spot to be in those shoes. Remember what happens to wax when it gets a little bit too warm ? I mean Cmoaaaaan.

    about 2 days ago from web in context
  23. @zennx Hehe

    about 2 days ago from Choqok in context
  24. @zennx It is indeed still funny :D

    about 2 days ago from web in context
  25. @zennx only god can judge me

    about 2 days ago from web in context
  26. @zennx I thought it was funny.

    about 2 days ago from Choqok in context
  27. @zennx Why the hell would I want to have Kel Tuzad's chestpiece ? Downing a raidboss made for lvl 80's when you are level 100 ( 3 expansions ago I think ? ) is probably not good for anything but "the looks" ( transmogrification sets ). Not saying I am still doing that, but I can totally get behind one's motivation for those still playing. ( I stopped playing WoW, again, the next expansion I might not even come back at all, So sad you can't buy less than a month of playing time )

    Disclaimer : Not even sure if Kel Thuzad even drops a chestpiece

    about 2 days ago from web in context
  28. @zennx I don't like shinies, or rather I don't like catching them because I'd feel too inclined to try and get every shiny variant

    about 2 days ago from web in context
  29. @zennx I'm not so worried about IVs, just bragging rights. And maybe spamming the Wonder Trade. <_<

    about 2 days ago from MuSTArDroid in context
  30. @zennx There's nothing good in that show, at all

    about 10 days ago from web in context

Affiliates

Fluttershy.org Sonic Radioboom Brony Aerospace Bronies UK EquestriaGaming PonySquare
Cornify