Replies to zennx, page 23
-
@zennx There is no center to the void maelstrom of idea's and thoughts...
Oh yeah, that is right, I think of my brain as a void maelstrom of idea's -
@zennx *becomes paralized for a few seconds as I gaze into the jaws of the abyss* ... ... ... Wow...
I love that you shared this though, it is awesome -
@zennx Fluffle Puff, NO, enemy GOAL, not goat, don't throw balls at goats, goats are cool
-
@zennx all of this handwritten http://www.brasilhandebol.com.br/noticias_detalhes.asp?id=27182 (well, not exactly like this because it was an older version, but whatever)
-
@zennx Due to me never seeing "Teen Titans", I actually thought the first episode of "Teen Titans Go!" rather funny.
But, ehmm. I get the jest. PPG's twerking... Childhood-cyanide™ -
@zennx That's racist
-
@zennx And then some wonder why people support Trump.
-
@mrmattimation @zennx Thank you
-
@zennx Well, that Patreon thingie is actually icing on the cake. ( I touched it when I said "unique position", although I just realized that Thunderf00t also has Patreon in a simmilar if not same manner, and then there are others ). But yes, you are right... Well he has something to lose, and that is being booted off of YouTube completely because of his shenanigans. But do you honestly think YouTube ( as a company who'se primary motivation seems money ) is to start setting fire to Jim's proverbial ship with the possibility of the whole harbour catching fire ? ... Yeah... I love to see this play out
-
@zennx Clearly, you have no clue how the "system" works. If you make a claim on me I can immediately dispute it and until that issue gets settled, all of the money earned by the video in that time period would be placed in a holding account, and once YouTube determines who the money rightfully belongs to (me) I will get the money that was earned in the time it takes the claim to be dismissed.
-
@mrmattimation @zennx And in that last 'rant' I saw absolutely nothing that is not ( together with that last thing I said ) proving to either be great for "fair use" or terribly bad for either Jim or Youtube.
-
@zennx So, rather than just, say, NOT use copy-written content in your own videos, therefore allowing you to legally monetize your own videos (I cannot stress enough that if you're using other people's ideas, music, video, etc. you are not legally in the position to complain if they take your revenue) like a reasonable person would do, you would rather INCREASE the amount of content that is not yours, creating a high risk for an eventual takedown (I also cannot stress that fact enough), simply so that the publishers or copyright holders of the works which you are using illegally don't make money off of the video which you are not legally allowed to make money off of?
-
@mrmattimation @zennx *wressles with uncooperative RDN for a while*. I'm sorry but I just HAVE to react to this. Pretty sure Matt does not realize just who "Jim cherrying Sterling" is, what he is doing, and how he has at least one "YouTube insured & protected" video. In case you do not realize what this means, Jim is in an unique position. In the best case this means that YouTube has to shill out money to protect Jim and his channel ( by mobilizing whatever counter-force is required, like, you know, lawyers ). And it might even end up in Konami and Nintendo going at eachothers throat in the ensuring crossfire. And in the worst case scenario ( for jim ) then we see him go down with the ship ( all except for 1 protected video ).
I do not think Jim is that stupid, so he probably knows his stuff, and if not ? Well lets just say I always enjoyed a good ship-burning.
Regardless, if big Fluffle Puff goes down ( looks like it ) big changes are ensured to follow. -
@zennx I only thank Loki the trickster God ( Yes I brought the Trickster-DLC )
-
@zennx Please do not explain terms to me. I have to manage this Fluffle Puff regularly, I know what each one is. If you have twenty copyright claims from twenty different copyright holders, one of those claims is going to result in a takedown sooner or later..
-
@zennx That's, um...
If you go out and blatantly infringe someone else's copyright, they have every right to make a claim on you. That's on you. Not them. Infringing MULTIPLE companies' copyrights isn't going to somehow make you the good guy in that scenario, it just gives you that many more chances to get your video taken down by a lawyer representing one of the companies. -
@zennx why would every one be a bard?
-
@zennx i got it today, played the first stage with Lilac
-
@zennx But do they realize that everything in congress is stretched out to the point where it moves so slowly that scientists are not able to explain it ? I mean, could you put an FPS counter on that ?
-
@zennx [Jerry Seinfeld mode engaged] And you know why they would make bad (vice) presidents ? Ever had to make a really hard decision ? It's a really warm spot to be in those shoes. Remember what happens to wax when it gets a little bit too warm ? I mean Cmoaaaaan.
-
@zennx It is indeed still funny :D
