Notices by Omni (omni), page 26

  1. Some music is so nicely powerful: http://youtu.be/u8QSdQv53C0

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 20:22:01 UTC from web
  2. @techdisk I'm going to kill you in your sleep :(

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 19:52:51 UTC from web in context
  3. @widget Wednesdaymorning or Wednesdaynight?

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 19:21:38 UTC from web in context
  4. @widget Ah, I see. Well, that falls right under the "easy-to-bypass-but-nobody-thinks-of-it" thingies, so let's just shut up about it and make sure he won't find out how it works :x

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 19:15:40 UTC from web in context
  5. @redenchilada But you can't know that! \end{paranoidmode}

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 19:14:51 UTC from web in context
  6. @redenchilada For longer than seven minutes, duh!

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 19:13:08 UTC from web in context
  7. @ceruleanspark Aren't there... A zillion ways to bypass that? I won't state any here, though, but still...

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 19:07:31 UTC from web in context
  8. @ceruleanspark Unescapable? Did we start IP-banning or so?

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 19:05:21 UTC from web in context
  9. @redenchilada Well, this is true, and I guess the huge sales of Microsoft Office somewhat show that the same is the case for software. Oh well.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:59:25 UTC from web in context
  10. @redenchilada I guess that makes sense, but I still don't see why Microsoft wouldn't at least try to make more money then. Though, honestly, I often buy cheaper alternatives because they are cheaper and I am sure I'm not the only one who does this. I wouldn't spend more money on another piece of software which practically does the same, and Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator did practically do the same. So, if Microsoft would've sold Internet Explorer for a lower price than Netscape Navigator, assuming I would be living in those days, I would've most likely bought Internet Explorer instead of Netscape Navigator.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:56:22 UTC from web in context
  11. @widget I only now noticed Netscape Navigator was cross-platform compatible. That makes it more logical to behave like this. I still consider them jerks, though, as their greed is damaging our complete IT system, but I do understand the decision now.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:53:23 UTC from web in context
  12. @redenchilada I understand trying to squash the market before it became big, because the Internet would've obviously seemed like a cool thing, but why for free? Wouldn't it have been way more logical to just be cheaper than Netscape? They could've gotten a lot more money with that, while still harming Netscape a lot (seeing as Netscape Navigator, their browser, was their only product, Netscape wouldn't be able to financially afford going all that cheap).

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:44:06 UTC from web in context
  13. @madflavorstheoneoffvillain "Nobody appreciates my existence anymore I'm going to leave the fandom"? Mostly true, as far as I know, and I feel more and more distant from this fandom as a whole, but "leaving" is kinda hard if you've never been completely integrated :P

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:38:22 UTC from web in context
  14. @zeldatra Tell me how that is related?

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:36:36 UTC from web in context
  15. @redenchilada Netscape was not free software at the time, that only happened after they lost to Internet Explorer, where they donated the code to the Mozilla Foundation, and we all know the greatness that brought upon us. (Positive, of course, Mozilla Firefox is a great product and Mozilla's quick support for new technologies helps our web move forward at amazing speeds.) I'm not sure if we can talk about "seeing a market" when you give your product away for free, as they still do. If they really saw a market in browsers, why didn't they just sell Internet Explorer for a lower price than Netscape?

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:35:54 UTC from web in context
  16. @redenchilada Internet Explorer was made AFTER Netscape. The Netscape guys were not rivalling a Microsoft product AT ALL.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:26:36 UTC from web in context
  17. @zeldatra Okay, so that means we should just allow them? So, if I show up at your front door with five other people, it should be fine if I kick you together with them? Because I am bigger than you? There's nothing wrong with that? That something happens often does not mean it is right, and does not mean we should just let it happen without trying to fight against it.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:24:43 UTC from web in context
  18. @redenchilada With all due respect, you have no clue what is being done with this data, nor how valuable personal data is. This is a risk we are grossly underestimating in our society as a whole. I do agree that the tone in the article is somewhat overly paranoid, but this change is definitely not a change in the right direction.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:23:37 UTC from web in context
  19. @zeldatra You're justifying being a jerk for no reason, while it does not even help yourself at all but only damages others, by the fact that they're big? That's definitely more silly than what I am doing.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:21:24 UTC from web in context
  20. Oh, cool, I forgot to study for my German test on Monday. Well, dammit.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:18:58 UTC from web
  21. @nerthos They abused their market position to do it, and they merely did it to hurt another company, instead of making profit for themselves. If they would've done it to make more money, that would be way more understandable than if they would do it just for the sake of killing off another company, which is what they did.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:18:04 UTC from web in context
  22. @fortecadenza I would personally recommend Mint. Canonical is making some worrying changes to Ubuntu: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/ubuntu-spyware-what-to-do

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:16:54 UTC from web in context
  23. @techdisk Are you sure you are allowed to edit and redistribute ALL your software? Ubuntu and Arch are known to include proprietary software, where you do not have these rights.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:15:41 UTC from web in context
  24. @zeldatra If you use Microsoft Office on both, that argument is worthless. I'm still having trouble opening .docx files without losing the complete layout in LibreOffice (which DOES support the official implementation completely) and Microsoft Office, at least version 2007, doesn't support .odt and similar formats properly.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:14:37 UTC from web in context
  25. @techdisk I have a complete Operating System for free, including office suite and a huge selection of software, all of which I am allowed to edit according to my will and redistribute for free. Come at me.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:13:09 UTC from web in context
  26. @zeldatra Ah, okay, that makes more sense. I better hope this that version of Word FINALLY supports their own standards, and a fair amount of the official standards, but I have a feeling that it won't, as usual.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:12:12 UTC from web in context
  27. @zeldatra Are you sure you're talking about Microsoft Office and not Microsoft Works?

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:09:43 UTC from web in context
  28. @redenchilada Back in those days, it wasn't so normal, and there weren't really alternatives you could go for. The only thing you did was go to the shop and buy Netscape.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:09:26 UTC from web in context
  29. @zeldatra That's interesting, because they weren't in my copy

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:08:02 UTC from web in context
  30. @omni Bad choice of words. My point was: If Microsoft wanted to make money from Internet Explorer, why didn't they sell it? The only reason they had to include Internet Explorer in Windows was to get rid of Netscape. They had practically complete market dominance and getting Netscape to die only means loss for Netscape, no profit for Microsoft.

    Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:07:47 UTC from web in context