Notices by Brendan (haganbmj), page 7

  1. @haganbmj @pinhooves ~ Link color: # (0000EE) ~ I don't remember what it used to be though q.q ~ http://www.color-hex.com/color/0033cc perhaps?

    Thursday, 17-Nov-11 05:58:58 UTC from web in context
  2. @pinhooves They look much much brighter. That's interesting.

    Thursday, 17-Nov-11 05:57:34 UTC from web in context
  3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4cA01JljCs

    Thursday, 17-Nov-11 05:56:57 UTC from web
  4. @retl Dood, that'd be a whole new level of scootabuse.

    Wednesday, 16-Nov-11 22:29:46 UTC from web in context
  5. @ponydude2143 Yeah, and that's how they'll try and get it to go.

    Wednesday, 16-Nov-11 22:22:16 UTC from web in context
  6. @thebrilliantspy Haha - perhaps perhaps

    Wednesday, 16-Nov-11 22:21:56 UTC from web in context
  7. @thebrilliantspy Mhm, it's just hard to fully understand. And from what I understand as well, what you said would also be the case. The bill is flawed, and it shouldn't pass - but we'll just have to wait and see - and should it come into effect, we'll have to wait and see what the outcome of that will be fully.

    Wednesday, 16-Nov-11 22:16:44 UTC from web in context
  8. @thebrilliantspy Like there's actually some decent material in there; if I'm reading it correctly. ~~ "SEC. 202. TRAFFICKING IN INHERENTLY DANGEROUS GOODS OR SERVICES." Offenses: Whoever "intentionally traffics or attempts to traffic in labels, patches, stickers, wrappers, badges, emblems, medallions, charms, boxes, containers, cans, cases, hangtags, documentation, or packaging of any type or nature, knowing that a counterfeit mark has been applied thereto, the use of which is likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive, or". ~~ Which is really talking about counterfeit drugs, supplies, economic practice, etc ~~ I'm not very knowledgeable in legal procedure, but that seems fine

    Wednesday, 16-Nov-11 22:12:15 UTC from web in context
  9. @thebrilliantspy Nah, I love searching around to reading up on it myself. It's awfully difficult to read the actual bill, but I gave it a shot - at least skimming the sections. ~ Most people just jump to the first thing someone says and run with it, instead of actually interpreting the words and drawing their own conclusion.

    Wednesday, 16-Nov-11 22:07:05 UTC from web in context
  10. @thebrilliantspy lol, yep - I'm aware. I see a lot of people overreacting without actually reading the info (even if it does warrant that reaction). ~ People need to read before they speak. Happens all the time in the Magic the Gathering community, and people just seem to never learn.

    Wednesday, 16-Nov-11 22:02:47 UTC from web in context
  11. @purpletinker I'm aware of that, any reference to or link to material of the sort is a valid target. Looks to suppress the funds and validity of websites if they slip up.

    Wednesday, 16-Nov-11 22:01:45 UTC from web in context
  12. @thebrilliantspy Need to learn to read a bit. It's a censorship bill in congress looking to block sites that share media (movies, music) and punish that which shares or spreads that kind of material.

    Wednesday, 16-Nov-11 21:58:51 UTC from web in context
  13. @duskdweller Nah, seems fine to me xD

    Wednesday, 16-Nov-11 21:54:54 UTC from web in context
  14. @carcino Nah, it's code for #

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:37:00 UTC from web in context
  15. @carcino Like ponies.

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:35:04 UTC from web in context
  16. @ponydude2143 Ahhh ahh ah - that's great to know. I'll keep that in mind. Tricky Tricky

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:34:55 UTC from web in context
  17. @carcino q.q I learned a handful of things in High School... and then forgot them.

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:33:16 UTC from web in context
  18. @colfax xD Sounds good, I'll see what I can get done on that front.

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:33:03 UTC from web in context
  19. @ponydude2143 You know, that might be what I had done initially was not declare the first element in the array. I know I added that later in my selection, but I don't recall if I tried it initially. I'll look again at some point here.

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:31:31 UTC from web in context
  20. @carcino Oh pshyeah, I hated doing the work. It was repetitive easy stuff - and you never really learned anything new.

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:28:15 UTC from web in context
  21. @colfax Yeah, each refresh is essentially a new page. That instance though where you (de)crypted it will be faulty though.

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:27:38 UTC from web in context
  22. @carcino Haha perhaps so - perhaps. ~ Algebra, that's some fun stuff though - It's what lost me the most points in Calc hah. I actually remember adding 2 and 3 and getting 4. ~ Lost a good deal of points for that :/

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:24:45 UTC from web in context
  23. @ponydude2143 Yeah, it was confusing me when it was returning undefined for any of the other functions. I was also having some strange issues getting the Query selection to work. It didn't want to process jQ('#' + target + ' div p.notice_stufforsomething') ~ I tried a few varients, with the overall intent being to select the id of the notice, and the p.notice-content or something within it. It was freaking out, so I did .find() instead.

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:23:48 UTC from web in context
  24. @carcino She's a self-proclaimed math prodigy (sort of) hah

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:21:53 UTC from web in context
  25. @scoot Left music I think it was - he wants to do other stuff within the fandom (I think graphics actually).

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:20:09 UTC from web in context
  26. @carcino Not a whole lot here - just waiting around to get an assembly program checked/validated. Fun stuff. How about you?

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:18:31 UTC from web in context
  27. @carcino *poke* *poke*

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:17:20 UTC from web in context
  28. @ponydude2143 Could be - there's nothing to modify the avatars (or their parent containers), so I can't imagine the flickering would come from anything in the script.

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:15:27 UTC from web
  29. @ponydude2143 I was trying to get innerText, contentText, or whatever the synonyms were to work - but I couldn't get anything going other than .text on Chrome. (And I see you sent other messages - going to read those now)

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 19:13:42 UTC from web in context
  30. @lyokotravels Haha, same here - I never just sit on rdn. I let it go in the background and check whenever the number of new posts nears 20. If I didn't have the refresh I would virtually never refresh the page ~~ The internet is for multitasking xD

    Tuesday, 15-Nov-11 07:50:44 UTC from web in context