Notices by Alcoholic Beast (drinkingpony), page 2

  1. @scribus Secret ant campaign !

    about 8 months ago from web in context
  2. @adiwan Fans are gonna fan, untill something happens that makes them not want to be a fan anymore.

    I remember reading about some guy who had made a MCU-Wall, containing the DVD cover for every Marvel Superhero movie ever released, complaining about how he did not really like one particular movie but was still deadset on getting the thing for his wall since else his collection would be incomplete ( this was years ago )

    Extreme fans gonna extreme fan I guess.

    Hell, kinda reminds me of this 2 hour long thing of some guy who was harassing a movie critic on Discord for a debate for his opinion on a movie was SO WRONG he simply had to correct the narrative, or at least attempt to, it was a total fail and is probably one of the best examples of how to learn from other people's mistakes ( ) Its quite humorous at times, but I am not sure if I can recommend it unless if you got 2 hours to waste.

    ( Such as when on CCTV monitor duty at work at night)

    about 8 months ago from web in context
  3. Supplementary and hilarious video regarding Ross Marquand

    Guess who he is voicing. Just saying. He probably knew a little boatload more about acting like Han Solo.

    Probably the Seawise Giant, the largest boat in the world after a quick google search.

    Do not take anything in this post/dash/rainbowpost serious or use it for anything other than a reason to smirk, laugh, or something like that.

    about 8 months ago from web
  4. @mrmattimation Didn't they say the same thing about the current president ?

    Aging like milk that one is.

    But to adres what you said. It is not the fact that she is fighting someone who isn't on the ballot, It is that the other party picked a fight and lost in the most spectacular way. I hope you like seeing her on the debate stage ( even if she might not get any microphone time ). Remember who you have to thank for that, someone who has been an insider for YEARS.

    about 8 months ago from web in context
  5. Well, my search of Overwatch vs Paladins led me through some weird hole that I am now sad that I never got to play Gigantic.

    Video that got me 'there' :

    about 8 months ago from web
  6. @scribus ?

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  7. RIP E-sports 1972 - 2020

    It was fun while it lasted.

    Open the floodgates for the normies I guess.

    Bazinga and all that jazz.

    Some humming

    This is why I DRIIIIIINK !!!

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  8. @adiwan Oh hey if you can get over the thicc accent this is a nice review. If I did not have a pile of those things lying round I would get one

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  9. Someone just sat me down so I could watch .

    TMW you do not know if you should actually laugh out loud or not, who knows the person showing it to you was a devout CAD.

    He wasn't tho. I got to empty a bucket of laugh right then and there. Boy I tell you, that was a tense moment tho. I was not sure how much cropped up laughed my bucket would hold before overflowing.

    about 9 months ago from web
  10. @scribus Well, if I cut out all the nasty, it is not that nasty... ( wow, that might be the dumbest thing I have ever said )

    But just think of the most stereotype "Hardcore Christian, hardcore recycle, 'My opinion is better than anyone elses'-spouting, knitting needles toting" mom you can think of.

    Well, yeah, in that light it does not sound bad. Untill either of the following happens ;

    A : Little Timmy discovers the Internet ( and search engines )

    B : Vaccination rollout day at school ( because that is not a hot button topic in the modern world )

    C : Little Timmy is not happy with the thick sheep-wool socks he got for his birthday ( Since Little Timmy wanted a NINTENDO SIXTYFOUR ( ) )

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  11. @adiwan Poor woman. On the brighter side of things I guess that I just won a bet with someone.

    I think it went like "Oh man there is NO WAY that famous people can take so much selfies that they compromise their own security" "Wanna bet something like that happens before 2020 ?" "Oh you're on"

    Also we may have been talking about this before

    Then again I am talking about a conversation that happened, what ? 4 years ago ?

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  12. I just saw the thing and the first thing I googled did not let me down. Image inserted here.

    "But it was revealed the 20th of last month"

    Yeah but I was busy doing LITTERALLY ANYTHING ELSE. Apple is a joke

    about 9 months ago from web
  13. @scribus I technically have. No it was not shot on camera, but here is an incident of what happened prior. Oddly enough noone thought to up security around him for some reason

    I happened to be in the Netherlands when he was killed. He would have been voted the Prime Minister if he would have lived through the election process because enough people still voted for him even though he was dead.

    For normal civilian life nothing happened that day which was out of the ordinary.

    Meanwhile a friend of mine lived through the 2016 Turkish coup d'etat attempt while being in Ankara. Which was frightning for ALL the reasons you could think of.

    "Ohh, tanks are too big for pedestrian roads, wait hold on, ITS COMING RIGHT FOR US !"

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  14. @scribus I think I kinda see what you mean, but in the same breath it was not Twitter that got scrutinized after a certain madman besmirched one of my favourite Initial D songs somewhere over in New Zealand. Those were 8Chan, Kiwifarms, Facebook, Discord and 9gag.

    Actually Discord is having a really double reason there.

    Not to mention that there are enough people around that hate the Twitter Verified Blue Checkmark ( ) seeing it as a "blue pill" or "Loony Lefty approved club"

    It is actually that specific part where I think you are wrong when you say "Twitter is a single ecosystem. There are no groups," ( @mrmattimation @notice/5464941) . But you are right in that it's like a cocktail party with everyone, there is no structural division. Just a battle over who has the most trending hashtag. Unless if you want to count popularism and realize that if you are a nobody with the greatest thing to say, you will still be ignored.

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  15. @mrmattimation Why wait ? get your warm feelz today

    That is the trumptwitterarchive

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  16. Why are people in that twitter thread sharing a picture of the 1972 election and treating it like a victory ? ( )

    I mean if it is a quip about how Trump is a crook then they pretty much say 25% of the people inside of the U.S.A. to be stupid ( 56% of America voted, out of which roughly half voted for Trump ).

    You garner no good will with those people, and you want those people to NOT vote Trump in 2020. So that is pretty much the equivallent of a 12 year old throwing a temper tantrum going "YOU'RE WRONG !"

    But hey, I can see their point. But there was a smart and a stupid way to go about it from my perspective. and... "She chose, poorly" ( I kinda thought a Last Crusade quote would fit well, seeing I think the Democrats should rally before they actually become responsible for a Orange-inspired 2nd term )

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  17. @scribus I'm sorry, I did not know.

    does a little digging

    I assume you mean

    Hmm, interesting. Well it is mostly red, no denying there. We know why all those little districts are red too, so he is not wrong. But we ALSO know that Hillary got the popular vote in about 65,853,514 vs 62,984,828. So if nothing else it's just party grand standing, like an echo chamber.

    TL;DR : Keep calm, carry on, also laugh whenever you spot people trying to subvert your version of reality by showing you how THEY think the world works. Laugh them right in their stupid face.

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  18. @thelastgherkin Why do I have to think of this thing now ? ( 10 second clip from Spaceballs )

    Probably the "grand overlord" part which makes it sound funny.

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  19. Ohh, got a hunch and guess what I found at the back of my closet. There is a reason why I hoard useful stuff. It's actually a "couteau à pizza", which I guess gives away its original design plan by the person who designed it. But I used it for cheese mostly ( I do not eat a lot of Pizza, though it works like a dream on the crust. Way better than the Borderland 2 Psycho Pizza-thing, no contest ).

    I guess I probably break some law of recursive functions by using a utensil the wrong way in the correct way that was designed wrongly by stealing an idea from abbey monks. Ohkay I have NO idea how to untangle that.

    Reason why I forgot about my first one ? It got kinda blunt, so I took it with me to some Renaissance faire thingie so I could ask a blacksmith-like person how to proper sharpen it when he gave me some 60 Euro's for it. HAH, like I am going to say no to that.

    Oh right, I am spouting exposition again arn't I ? Apologies.

    Also #'leth

    about 9 months ago from web
  20. @drinkingpony CAN do a Nelson-laugh, CAN !. But I won't since the whole ordeal has not been "ha-ha" funny in over 2 years now.

    I mean I forgot the name of the city/municipality but that whole Antifa block where the major and the sherrif/police are in on it and it caused more than a bakers dozen of 'broken noses'.

    If I have to point a turning point of 'ha-ha' into 'honk' or 'oh my god how terrible' it would have been that one.

    Oh right, an example of 'honk' would be - Washingtontimes - Cannibalism: Scientist says eating humans could save earth. That being only a low tier-'honk'. Most actual 'honk'-ness is SUPER polarising stuff I would not dream to post about.

    And now I have said 'honk' so many times the word has gone weird on me.

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  21. @adiwan Oh wow, I saw that video about 2 hours ago without context.

    Oddly, even though now I know just how tragic of an accident this was. My reaction is pretty much still akin to this

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  22. @scribus Yes, and with good reason. The sheer amount of firearms present in the America's pretty much requires all police officers to have a good training for every possible what if scenario. Just for metermaids alone there is a 6 hour long training every quarter/halfyear just to go over 'what would you do if'-training.

    Whereas in most parts of Western Europe you live really closely together, even in the inner cities apparently to population density ( so getting help is seemingly a lot easier by, Idunno, simply screaming for help ) and the amount of officers that get hurt/injured on the job is rivaling that of librarians. That includes paper-cuts by the way.

    Also for some reason I am now reminded of . I guess I know why, kinda. Still a fun RLM vid to watch :)

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  23. "If this phonecall is so damning then why did he even release the transcript, only an idiot would do that"

    4 seconds later

    "Like he is the only person that does something so bad, right out there in the open that it makes YOU question, on whether it is actually bad"

    "Right ?"

    Au-contraire, Trevor Noah, I absolutely know it is bad. I mean. I remember the shill words you did for Battlefield V, Tre-Five-Or. ( watch these 25 seconds right here if you want context : ... Watch the whole thing if you can stand a ranting New Yorker for about 40 minutes. Is it worth it ? I'd say yes )

    Tre5or goes on : "it has become somewhat of a political Rorschach test, where Democrats and republicans see what they want to see, it be either a smoking gun, or something to prove innosence. Yet they voted 100-0 on it. ... I think that a guy in a fish costume is WAY better suited as explanation than Tre5or.

    I miss Jon Steward so much T_T

    about 9 months ago from web
  24. @scribus I am sorry, I can only seem to think about this now .

    Warning : Pretty sure my strict aunt would classify that as either NSFW or "weirdo internet batcave" ( which is by her definition NSFW )

    about 9 months ago from web in context
  25. Guide to modern movie criticism

    1 : Say movie is great

    2 : Invalidate everyone's opinion who does not like the movie and mention that "Your opinion is all subjective anyway"

    3 : "You probably have not seen the movie anyway, but if you actually have, then do not go see the next one"

    There, just saved you about an hour, now you do not need to go see ( Network 1901, DaleKnows, MenAreRuiningStarWars ). Oh I also cut out all the sexist pingas.

    about 10 months ago from web
  26. @mrmattimation Yes it is. I am left thinking about

    about 10 months ago from web in context
  27. @scribus Of course there is supposed to be. How else do you think something like this can happen ? ( picture says it all, really )

    about 10 months ago from web in context
  28. @scribus Well, I guess it is time to say farewell to the department of "making FrankerZ up as I go" ... Wait a minute, You are just trying to sell me a Wheel O'Scapegoats arn't you ? Hell I dare to bet that this entire room is made out of chocolate or something

    Oh and yeh I probably watch way too much weird Potato Knishes on the net

    about 10 months ago from web in context
  29. @mrmattimation the "non sequitur"-level seems high I am not sure whether to call it a day or to point out that I have NO idea how actual vote totals (from when? 2016? from whom? MSM ?) can be used to establish anything on the level as big as a whole state.

    But hey, if you are willing to still believe that so called 'professionals' are better at predicting at what whole states will probably end up voting when there is also Matt Groening, I am not gonna stop you.

    As for that Trump did worse than Romney and McCain in some area's. Yeah I am willing to believe that, there are things like home states, there are things like actively or passively pandering to special/specific intrest groups.

    Lets not forget the Bernie Bro's ( name ? ) which voted for trump in 2016.

    Oh, or the people from the Rust Belt who vowed to vote democrat in the local elections but Trump for 2020

    Because aparently that's a thing

    about 10 months ago from web in context
  30. @adiwan Nice.

    While on that subject

    about 10 months ago from web in context